‘His spirit will continue to animate the
schools he founded’.
Handing on the
specific Josephite spirit to future generations.
FR MARTIN ASHCROFT CJ
Dissertation in partial fulfilment of the
MA in Chaplaincy Studies.
St Mary’s
October 2005.

Canon Constant William van Crombrugghe
(1789-1865)
Founder of the Congregation of the Josephites.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank my Josephite
confrères for giving me the time and space to undertake this study. My thanks
and appreciation must also go to those who have participated in this research,
particularly the six members of staff at St George’s whose willingness to be
interviewed enabled this study to be completed. Furthermore, I would like to
acknowledge the wonderful welcome and enriching experience I enjoyed while
staying at St Ignatius College, Riverview at
Abstract
Since its original foundation in 1869,
In the past, the ethos of
Against this background, the Introduction starts
by emphasising the importance of the underpinning ethos for a school’s success.
It then establishes leadership formation as a raison d’être of Josephite schools and highlights the move towards
a more collaborative approach to ministry in schools in keeping with Vatican
II’s communio ecclesiology. The
second chapter articulates the specific attributes of Josephite educational ethos,
highlighting the importance of ‘family spirit’. The third chapter describes the
evolution of the research question and methodology while the fourth chapter highlights
the outcome of the interviews and offers a considered response to the research
question: ‘To what extent is the Josephite ethos being maintained at
Abstract Page 3
Contents Page 4
Chapter
1 Introduction
The aims of the study 5
The
importance of a school’s underpinning ethos 6
The
Josephites and their involvement in education 10
Collaboration 16
The
educational importance of this study 19
The
research question 20
Summary 20
Chapter
2 Articulating the Josephite Ethos
Identifying
the founding Josephite educational ethos 22
The Josephite educational ethos in the 21st century 31
Concluding remarks 33
Chapter
3 The research methodology
Establishing the
research question 36
The Methodology 37
Summary 42
Chapter
4 Analysis
The Data 44
The
extent to which the Josephite ethos is being maintained 53
Chapter
5 Conclusions 57
Bibliography
61
Chapter
One Introduction
This chapter starts by identifying the study’s
aims after which it establishes the importance of a school’s underpinning ethos
as well as the pivotal role teachers exercise in maintaining a school’s
distinctive ethos and culture. The chapter then moves on to outline the
specific historical context of the Congregation of Josephites as a teaching
order of Roman Catholic priests and brothers. The third part of the chapter highlights
the importance of collaboration, an issue religious orders are having to
address in respect of the governance and management of their (former) schools.
This is set against the background of the move towards a more collaborative
approach to ministry in the Roman Catholic church that finds its roots in the communio ecclesiology of the second
Vatican Council. The final part of the chapter identifies educational
importance of the study and the agreed research question.
The aims of the study
The aims of the study are to articulate
the Josephite educational ethos and establish the extent to which the staff are
maintaining this specific ethos at
The importance of a school’s
underpinning ethos
As a result of a number of recent studies,[1]
there is a growing consensus about the meaning and the importance of a school’s
underpinning ethos. A school’s ethos can be described as:
‘The
fundamental spirit of the school that gives orientation to the energies of the
school. Ethos is the touchstone for the character of the curriculum and the
culture of the school’ (Treston 2001:17).
Canavan and Monahan offer a similar
definition:
‘Ethos
refers to the unique set of values that drives all aspects of a school’s
culture’ (2000:2.27).[2]
The origin of a school’s specific ethos
can usually be found in the school’s own history. As a consequence, although schools
have to look to the future in order to survive and flourish, an appreciation of
the school’s past stories and historical traditions are essential to understanding
the evolution of its present underpinning ethos.[3] Therefore the quest to re-discover a school’s
founding ethos is much more important than Brien and Hack assume in their own
quest to emphasise, ‘What are we yet to become?’ rather than ‘Who founded us?’
and ‘What have we become?’ (2005:81).
A school is only as good as its ethos (Brick
1999:88) and for a school’s ethos to permeate the entire life of a school, there
must be a process of recognition and reflection (Gallagher 2003:196). To be
neutral or indifferent about the school’s moral or spiritual ethos will inevitably
generate an ethos of individualism, functionalism and ultimately fragmentation
(Williams 2003:1). Furthermore, this process of reflection needs to involve all
staff as it is they, rather than the pupils, who will maintain and reinforce
the individual school’s underpinning ethos and culture.
There are, however, a number of challenges
to the ethos of the Catholic school. Although Roman Catholic schools in England
have been revisiting their ethos to make it more explicit and transparent, many
teachers still lack a full understanding of the distinctive nature of the Roman
Catholic school ethos and, consequently, any commitment to live it out (§66 The Catholic School 2004:36).
Another challenge to the ethos of Catholic
schools is the increasing multi-faith culture of contemporary post-Christian
‘It is not always easy to bring these two aspects into harmony; the task
requires constant attention, so that the tension between a serious effort to
transmit culture and a forceful witness to the gospel does not turn into a
conflict harmful to both’ (§67 Church
Documents 2004:167).
The traditional ethos of independent
Catholic schools is being challenged by market forces and league tables
especially as Catholic parents are no longer automatically choosing Catholic schools
for their children, but those schools most likely to guarantee academic
results.[5]
Catholic schools that fail to reflect continually on their underpinning ethos
can end up becoming little more than ‘examination factories where position in
league table becomes their new raison
d’être’ (Brick 1999:103) under pressure from parental expectations and the
need simply to survive.[6]
Where this occurs, it will probably also have a negative affect on the Catholic
school’s prime commitment to religious, spiritual and moral interests (Grace
2002:181) as well as affecting its policies of admission and retention.[7]
Linked to this is the effective school movement that challenges the Catholic
schools’ ethos through a constant quest for ‘efficiency that is often given
precedence over issues of social justice’ (Spry 2000:125). Catholic schools also
need consider messages they are giving out about their ethos. For example, what
statement is being made when, after a string of academic and sporting awards, no
or only one award is given for Christian leadership? (cf Brien and Hack 2005:79).[8]
While ‘there is no one right way to live
out one’s Christian faith’ (Sullivan 2001:5), there is a direct linkage between
teacher relationships and a school’s ethos and, as a result, schools differ because
of these relationships (Rosenholtz cited by Angelides and Ainscow 2000:150). In
the ideal world, a Catholic school would be:
‘Permeated
by an ethos of prayer and moral virtue: this would, of course, depend on the character of the teachers
themselves. The integrating force behind the curriculum of such a school
would be love; love for creation, love for humanity, love for God – and finally
love between pupils and teachers’ (Caldecott 2005:40 - emphasis added).[9]
Finally, the on-going recovery of the past
at
The Josephites and their
involvement in education
It needs to be remembered that the
ecclesial, cultural and socio-political circumstances in 1817, when Constant
van Crombrugghe founded the Brothers of Mary and Joseph – the precursors of the
Josephites, were significantly different from those prevailing at the start of the 21st
Century.[10]
Furthermore, van Crombrugghe was an ultramontane, conservative priest[11]
who belonged to a Roman Catholic Church that saw itself as the societas perfecta, in other words, ‘the
perfect society - visible, hierarchical, and juridical’ (Hume 1988:66) in which
the few were ‘the custodians of power and truth’ (Cooper 1993:24). Moreover, at
the time, European culture was still overwhelmingly Christian in outlook and
practice albeit exhibiting nationalist tendencies.
It was on 1st May 1817 that Constant
van Crombrugghe, at the time a Canon of Gent Cathedral and Headmaster of Le
Collège d’Alost, founded a Roman Catholic Religious Order known as the
Brothers of Mary and Joseph that later became known as The Congregation of
Josephites.
Van Crombrugghe had humanitarian and
religious motives for the establishment of the Brothers of Mary and Joseph. He
wanted to alleviate the suffering and hardship caused by famine and the aftermath
of the Napoleonic wars. Van Crombrugghe also sought to protect the moral lives
of the young children from poor homes since he was convinced these children might
be forced, by their parents, into stealing food in order to survive and, as a
consequence, the children would fall away from their religious practices.[12]
Initially, the Brothers of Mary and Joseph were sent to van Crombrugghe’s own home
town of Grammont in West Flanders, now part of present day Belgium, where they
established work schools for the children.[13]
In setting up these work schools, van
Crombrugghe established the founding raison d’être for the Josephites and their schools: ‘The
evangelisation and education of young people’.
By the end of 1834, the Brothers of Mary
and Joseph were involved in the running of four schools in
During 1839 van Crombrugghe began to
conceive the idea of adapting the curriculum offered at Melle so that it might
better suit the needs of the new ruling classes and the socio-economic needs of
the country while not, at the same time, denying pupils the benefits of a
traditional Christian humanistic education. The following year, the revised
curriculum at College Melle introduced courses in Italian, German, Natural
Sciences, business and commercial law.[18]
In 1841, the Melle prospectus was published in English, German and Spanish and
emphasised this new curriculum. In 1843 Melle was given a new title: L’Institution
commerciale, industrielle, littéraire et scientifique de Melle. This
exciting and successful venture was brought to a premature end seventeen years
later due to new government regulations for entry to higher education. The
story of College Melle does, however,
illustrate the willingness of van Crombrugghe to radically adapt his schools to
changing circumstances.
The
final stage of the development of the Josephites and their schools, during the
life of van Crombrugghe, came with the acceptance of the offer made in 1842 by
Cardinal Archbishop de Sterckx of
Finally,
even though van Crombrugghe founded no more schools after
In 1869 the Josephites established a boys’
boarding school in
In 1989 the decision was taken to close
the boarding facility at the College and sell ‘Barrow Hills’, the boarding
preparatory school run by the Josephites since 1950, to the parents. In
September 1992, the Junior School of St
George’s College, located in the grounds of the College, opened an Infants
Department for boys that proved to be an immediate success. In September 1994,
girls were admitted into the Nursery at the
Furthermore, in another defining moment,
on
Collaboration
Since the second Vatican
Council’s Decree Perfectae Caritatis on
the renewal of Religious Life, members of religious orders have been
undertaking a process of rediscovering the original, founding charism of their
religious orders.
Running parallel with this
renewal has been a reappraisal of the relationship existing between consecrated
religious and the laity. This was precipitated, in part, by the post-Vatican II
ecclesial image of the Church as fellowship or communio. The Trinitarian
underpinning of communio, or koinonia as it is also called, is found
in §4 of Vatican II’s Lumen Gentium
where the universal church is
described as ‘a people made one from the unity of the Father, the Son and the
Holy Spirit’. Theologically speaking, collaborative ministry involves the
entire ‘People of God’ – laity, religious, priests and bishops – sharing their
common priesthood, working together in the Church’s mission and ministry as a
consequence of their Baptism (The Sign We
Give 1995:28).[22]
In addition, it is more than simply working as a team since to be considered as
collaborative ministry, five criteria need to be satisfied:
·
It must express the koinonia of the Church.
·
It must be an ecclesial activity.
·
There must be a commitment to values and
convictions.
·
There must be a desire to work together
because ‘we are called by the Lord to be a company of disciples, not isolated
individuals’.
·
It must be a ministry committed to the
mission of the Church (TSWG 1995:17).
Furthermore collaborative ministry, being
rooted in communio, is also a witness
and sign to others of ‘the inclusiveness of the Church’ (TSWG 1995:28).[23]
Since, therefore, a key feature of any authentic Catholic school is its existence
as a ‘community within the Church’ (Battams 2003:64), all Catholic schools should
have a spirit of collaboration as a distinguishing feature.
The
Sign We Give offers two
further important insights about collaborative ministry. First, it has to be a
consciously chosen commitment by all those involved since it will not function
when people are compelled to engage in it against their will (TSWG 1995:28).[24]
Secondly, because of its very nature, collaborative ministry requires a lengthy
process of skill development[25],
supported by group prayer and reflective theological practice (TSWG 1995:30),
and all must believe they have a meaningful and valued contribution to make (Slater
2004:4).
Communio ecclesiology and collaborative ministry have
significant implications for leadership within Catholic schools. Such schools
need special leadership because ‘they are special places that must respond to
the unique realities they face’ (Sergiovanni 2000:165). While Catholic schools
will never be democracies, they must embody a leadership spirit of collegiality
based on communio and subsidiarity,
which is the willingness to distribute discretionary decisions down to the
appropriate level, and a genuine sense of mutual trust throughout the entire
school community.
A third factor since the second Vatican
Council has been the dramatic decline in the number of consecrated religious
involved in education.[26]
The 2002
‘No difficulty should remove
consecrated men and women from schools and from education in general, when the
conviction of being called to bring the Good
News of the
Despite this injunction, some religious orders have already abandoned
their schools. Those orders, however, that are maintaining a presence in their
(former) schools are having to address issues of governance and management. As
a consequence, Josephites are no longer asking the traditional question, ‘How can
others help us?’ but rather ‘How can we help others at
The educational importance of
this study
The educational importance of this study is
grounded in the belief that a school’s ethos plays a pivotal role in establishing
the school’s culture and, therefore, the ultimate success or failure of a
school (Flynn 1993:7, Prosser 1999:3, Brick 1999:88).
Furthermore, the study should provide a
basis for others to build on in the future; a process that will also be able to
make considerable use of good practice already taking place in other schools
run, or formerly run, by religious orders.[28]
More specifically, this study is
undertaken in the belief that a role of school chaplains is to be ‘the court
jesters of old’ who remained outside the management line, but able to tell the
truth to those in authority without fear of losing their heads (Cameron
2000:12). In imitating Jesus, it is part of the prophetic role of school
chaplains to highlight incongruence between the school’s mission statement and
its ethos although the responsibility for upholding the school’s ethos should
not fall solely on the chaplains (Hayes 2002:134). It is also the responsibility of schools chaplains:
‘To
enable people to enter into the theological reflection required to ensure the
school environment, at both personal and institutional level, reflects gospel
values’ (CES 2004:12).[29]
In addition, chaplains need to ensure all
discussion about the school’s ethos values other people, respects their dignity,
and promotes dialogue and discussion rather than confrontation; since the ‘way
things are done is often more important than the end result’ (CES 2004:14).
The research question
It is because the staff in a school are so
crucial for maintaining the ethos of a school that this study seeks to ascertain
how well the staff are maintaining the Josephite educational ethos at St
George’s College, by asking the following research question: ‘To what extent is
the Catholic, Christian, Josephite ethos being maintained at St George’s
College today?’ Furthermore, it does so in the belief that, in the future, the
number of committed (practising Roman Catholic) teachers prepared to support the
school’s Catholic, Christian and Josephite ethos will be more critical for the
long term maintenance of this ethos than the percentage number of Roman
Catholic pupils attending the school.
Summary
The number of Josephites at
The next chapter seeks to articulate the
core aspects of the founding Josephite ethos using primary and secondary
sources relating to Constant van Crombrugghe.
Chapter 2 Articulating the Josephite educational ethos
After identifying van Crombrugghe’s founding vision for Josephite
schools, this chapter articulates and analyses the core aspects of Josephite educational
ethos.[30]
Identifying the founding Josephite educational ethos
It is possible to trace the roots of the
Josephite ethos back to the time van Crombrugghe spent as a boarder at the
Le Collège St Acheul at
‘I felt as though I had entered another family…The teachers, my friends,
rather than my professors, will remain models of holiness, of vigilance, of
fatherliness, of gentleness towards their students….in reality, this was the
beautiful ideal of a Christian boarding school… charity and union among all’
(Cited by Garcia 1980:21 and T Clements 1983:29).
In 1808, van Crombrugghe wrote to his
father making a tentative enquiry to see if he would support the idea of allowing
Sister Julie Billiart to set up an orphanage in Grammont similar to the one she
was running in Montdidier.[33]
In the end the idea came to nothing but was indicative of Constant’s concern
for the plight of the poor and disadvantaged.[34]
During his last year at
Figure 1 Part of the revised rules for the choristers at

In September 1814, just two years after
his ordination, van Crombrugghe sent by his bishop to be headmaster of Le
Collège d’Alost.[36]
He arrived to discover the school had just five pupils and the previous headmaster
had not been a Roman Catholic. When van Crombrugghe left in 1825, Le Collège
d’Alost had become one of the most sought after schools in Flanders and
equal in stature with Le Collège St Acheul at
It was while at Alost that van
Crombrugghe began to formulate his vision
for education as the process for forming L‘honnête
homme et parfait Chrétien.[38]
‘The goal which one proposes in this house is to cultivate the mind and
heart of young people….the young people admitted to the College receive a
careful and complete education, adapted to all states of life. It is therefore
education’s task to form the good man and to prepare him for society;
consequently its task is to form in youth both the heart and the mind, to
perfect reason and to adorn the imagination’.[39]
At
‘The teacher shall so train the youths entrusted to the Society’s care
that they may acquire not only learning but also habits of conduct worthy of a
Christian. He should endeavour both in the classroom and outside to train the
impressionable minds of his pupils in the loving service of God and in all the
virtues required for this service’.[41]
The stress was on
formation rather than information and the aim was the development of the
character as well as the skills necessary for learning through the integration
of the spiritual, moral and intellectual aspects of education.[42]
The attitude of the Jesuit teacher to the pupil was as ‘father
to son’. Extra care and attention was to be given to those who appeared to be
struggling while discipline was firm but sensitive.[43] As with
the Jesuits, van Crombrugghe believed religion
underpinned everything in education.
‘The fear of the Lord is the foundation of wisdom. There is no good education which is not founded on religion and piety towards God. Since religion is the foundation of the building on which we are working, it must